|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Nov 4, 2008 22:08:05 GMT -5
The board looks amazing host!! We can we start signing up?
And yeah, I think Dan is gonna win. Paloma always gets ripped off at the f3, I think she deserved to make finals over Dan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Nov 4, 2008 22:10:22 GMT -5
Wait... so Jamie made the photoshopped score? *is confused*
|
|
|
|
Post by Host on Nov 4, 2008 22:34:16 GMT -5
Thanks  Its going to be sometime later this week. And I agree that Paloma deserved it more than Dan, but it was expected or Dan to make F2. Jamie did Peih-Gee's tiebreaker, and she claims that he Photoshopped it to get her out. However he is denying it. I'll post the screenshot here later (its in my PM box) because it was pixelated (which calls for a not too shabby Photoshop job) around all the important parts (name, player, scores, etc.) and I was really skeptical about it. When I showed it to some other people who aren't in the game they said it was clear as day that it was Photoshopped so I just called it then. |
|
|
|
Post by Alexis Jones on Nov 5, 2008 12:54:47 GMT -5
LOL
This people are so ignorant...
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexis Jones on Nov 5, 2008 12:55:32 GMT -5
We should sign-up before them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexis Jones on Nov 5, 2008 12:57:41 GMT -5
BTW the board is hawt.
|
|
|
|
Post by Host on Nov 5, 2008 16:02:33 GMT -5
I am loving this finale, probably the best one in Elite Survivor history (at least in my opinion as of now.) I always love it when two people start off on different tribes, because its very interesting to see what an Ahi like Dan did versus what a Moana like Jamie did. I know that a lot of agree that Jamie played a better game, but I couldn't help but feel that his Opening Statement was much weak in comparison to Dan's. I think he knew what he wanted to say, but he didn't execute it well enough. However Dan was able to make something out of his Opening Statement and he'll probably run with it. Kinda what I did in SRSC Africa (Sandra knows what I'm talking about  ) |
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Nov 5, 2008 16:27:04 GMT -5
I know that a lot of agree that Jamie played a better game, but I couldn't help but feel that his Opening Statement was much weak in comparison to Dan's. I think he knew what he wanted to say, but he didn't execute it well enough. However Dan was able to make something out of his Opening Statement and he'll probably run with it. Kinda what I did in SRSC Africa (Sandra knows what I'm talking about ) I agree on both parts. Dan's opening statement was better. I think big opening statements are good but Jamie didn't edit his at all it seems and it was kinda confusing and didn't offer good reasons as to why he should win. And you're right, Dan's is kind of like how your answers were in SSC Africa. He clearly said what his strategy was and is backing it up and really proving why he should win. I think Dan will win 5-2. |
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Nov 5, 2008 16:31:53 GMT -5
Paloma's really bitter I kinda expected that from her. But I do kinda see her point. I mean winning ICs doesn't neccasarily mean you deserve to win over someone who didn't, and really, that's what mainly seperates Dan and Jamie. |
|
|
|
Post by Alexis Jones on Nov 5, 2008 16:34:27 GMT -5
I don't like her. If I find out who she is next season I will target her ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by Host on Nov 5, 2008 16:49:13 GMT -5
I think that Paloma is really hypocritical in some sense. I mean Jamie backstabbed her and she FLIPPED out. But then she can backstab all she wants & its fine. What puts the icing on the cake here is Dan giving Jamie the answers, but she's not mad at Dan at all. Dan gets off easy for "doing what he had to do" when Jamie was the one who made more radical moves (overcoming a 6-4 majority, he really did what he had to do) yet is targeted for being a backstabber. I think the whole arrogant thing would not have been played out of it was Dan in her Gaboners alliance.
Also, Jamie always plays the game like this. He becomes hated, goes on an Immunity streak, & then acts like he should win & he's all that. He doesn't realize that its not who wins the most Immunities, its who outwits, outplays, and outlasts the others. He almost sets himself up to lose (happened in my other series, Survivor Classic. He came in second in Africa, won 5/7 individual Immunities, & acted like hot shit) but he doesn't realize it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexis Jones on Nov 5, 2008 17:07:34 GMT -5
LOL Reminds me of Jenna in Amazon Re-Do. LAWLZ. So controling. Joanna sucked that season  Janet>the rest of the cast. Jacquie>Crystal |
|
|
|
Post by Host on Nov 6, 2008 18:18:16 GMT -5
Jerri never fails to amuse me lmao. Biggest contradiction ever. She claims to not be bitter, yet defines bitter in a nutshell. My love for Joel has come back with him calling them all out.
Right now the vote count is 3 Dan (Paloma, Jerri, Crystal) to 1 Jamie (Andrew). Peih-Gee, Joel, & Erik need to vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Nov 6, 2008 21:06:18 GMT -5
Erik will probably vote for Jamie. Peih-Gee for Dan, and Joel can go either way. So it looks like Dan's the winner.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on Nov 6, 2008 22:05:28 GMT -5
Bitter jurors are a part of the game. If Jamie can't get to the final 2 without pissing people off then that's a strategy flaw. I mean I think he deserves to win but part of everyone's strategy should be thinking about how to break as few alliances as possible so the jurors will vote for you.
|
|
Its going to be sometime later this week. And I agree that Paloma deserved it more than Dan, but it was expected or Dan to make F2.
)